<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rule of 72 &#8211; How It Helps, And How It Doesn&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://morethanfinances.com/the-rule-of-72-how-it-helps-and-how-it-doesnt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://morethanfinances.com/the-rule-of-72-how-it-helps-and-how-it-doesnt/</link>
	<description>Get your finances in order, and get on with your life!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 23:14:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://morethanfinances.com/the-rule-of-72-how-it-helps-and-how-it-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morethanfinances.com/?p=1385#comment-325</guid>
		<description>Hey mat,

Thanks for stopping by. Yep, the way to calculate the actual time to double is pretty simple. Using Excel&#039;s NPER function, you put in your desired percentage in the Rate field, put -1 in the Pv field, and 2 in the Fv field. Leave the Pmt and Type fields blank. 

If this is a bit confusing and you want the actual spreadsheet, let me know and I&#039;ll send it to you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey mat,</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by. Yep, the way to calculate the actual time to double is pretty simple. Using Excel&#8217;s NPER function, you put in your desired percentage in the Rate field, put -1 in the Pv field, and 2 in the Fv field. Leave the Pmt and Type fields blank. </p>
<p>If this is a bit confusing and you want the actual spreadsheet, let me know and I&#8217;ll send it to you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mat</title>
		<link>http://morethanfinances.com/the-rule-of-72-how-it-helps-and-how-it-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morethanfinances.com/?p=1385#comment-323</guid>
		<description>Hey, Very interesting points, loved everything about it...
Is there a way to come up with a formula for the lower then 7% or higher then 10% ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Very interesting points, loved everything about it&#8230;<br />
Is there a way to come up with a formula for the lower then 7% or higher then 10% ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://morethanfinances.com/the-rule-of-72-how-it-helps-and-how-it-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 04:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morethanfinances.com/?p=1385#comment-321</guid>
		<description>FinEngr - You brought up a good point. These calculations also don&#039;t take taxes into account, or inflation for that matter. For that, you&#039;d need a fancy calculator like the HP 12C or TI BA II Plus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FinEngr &#8211; You brought up a good point. These calculations also don&#8217;t take taxes into account, or inflation for that matter. For that, you&#8217;d need a fancy calculator like the HP 12C or TI BA II Plus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FinEngr</title>
		<link>http://morethanfinances.com/the-rule-of-72-how-it-helps-and-how-it-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>FinEngr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 03:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morethanfinances.com/?p=1385#comment-320</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-313&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Darren&lt;/a&gt;: 

It wasn&#039;t the inputs per se, but the calculators.  I started with the same variables, then some asked more than others - so I tried to keep it as consistent as possible.

Some asked for tax bracket while others asked what type of accounts (taxable/non-tax) for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-313" rel="nofollow">Darren</a>: </p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t the inputs per se, but the calculators.  I started with the same variables, then some asked more than others &#8211; so I tried to keep it as consistent as possible.</p>
<p>Some asked for tax bracket while others asked what type of accounts (taxable/non-tax) for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://morethanfinances.com/the-rule-of-72-how-it-helps-and-how-it-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morethanfinances.com/?p=1385#comment-313</guid>
		<description>Thanks FinEngr. Yeah, because they&#039;re approximations, it helps to know how to compute actual future value, time horizon, interest rate, and other similar variables. 

Just curious, what inputs did you use that led you to a 12-year time difference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks FinEngr. Yeah, because they&#8217;re approximations, it helps to know how to compute actual future value, time horizon, interest rate, and other similar variables. </p>
<p>Just curious, what inputs did you use that led you to a 12-year time difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FinEngr</title>
		<link>http://morethanfinances.com/the-rule-of-72-how-it-helps-and-how-it-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>FinEngr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morethanfinances.com/?p=1385#comment-312</guid>
		<description>Nice write-up &amp; graphics.  Very important to understand that these are approximations, and actual results can vary significantly based on your parameters.

Over-simplifying the results can have very real effects.  For example, I went through and entered similar data into different retirement calculators.  The time it would take me to reach $1M varied by about 12 years!


To answer your question - I think the power of the rule comes in product comparison, when you&#039;re looking at different investment vehicles for a specific time frame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice write-up &amp; graphics.  Very important to understand that these are approximations, and actual results can vary significantly based on your parameters.</p>
<p>Over-simplifying the results can have very real effects.  For example, I went through and entered similar data into different retirement calculators.  The time it would take me to reach $1M varied by about 12 years!</p>
<p>To answer your question &#8211; I think the power of the rule comes in product comparison, when you&#8217;re looking at different investment vehicles for a specific time frame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://morethanfinances.com/the-rule-of-72-how-it-helps-and-how-it-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morethanfinances.com/?p=1385#comment-302</guid>
		<description>Thanks Neal! Never heard of that approximation for seconds in a year. Nice tip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Neal! Never heard of that approximation for seconds in a year. Nice tip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monterey Marketing Lab (Neal)</title>
		<link>http://morethanfinances.com/the-rule-of-72-how-it-helps-and-how-it-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Monterey Marketing Lab (Neal)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morethanfinances.com/?p=1385#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Cool post Darren,
It&#039;s good to have some quick numbers like that in your back pocket.  As I have studied physics we had a few like that.  Like the number of seconds in a year is approximately pi x 10^7.
-Neal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool post Darren,<br />
It&#8217;s good to have some quick numbers like that in your back pocket.  As I have studied physics we had a few like that.  Like the number of seconds in a year is approximately pi x 10^7.<br />
-Neal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

